I
like that for once, the speaker’s name is the same as the author’s. (Although,
we still cannot automatically assume they are the same person. Maybe More just ran
out of names for characters?) The fact that More’s Utopia is so influential makes me feel better for telling vague
stories. I feel like I am listening to a friend talk on and on about what he
thought was the most important part of his conversation with Raphael, which is
a nice change of how storytelling I approached from Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales.
Raphael
sounds like the ultimate critic of… everything (except Utopia and its
surrounding countries, of course). He shoots down the suggestion that he should
be an advisor to a king, since kings don’t care about philosophy, and he argues
against England’s current punishments for criminals, pretty much saying
execution does not get at the root of the problem nor does it deter crime. Raphael
comes off as kind of a bad-ass philosopher who doesn't like the game, nor does
he intend to change it because that would require going through imperfect
channels.
Maybe
it is just me, but I like Raphael’s preferred punishment system, as it insists proportionality
between the punishment and crime, and ensures fair payment to the ones harmed.
It seems like a better version of our current jail system since prisoners are not
physically locked up (although I wouldn't say I would relish getting a piece of
my ear chopped off). It is strange that he comes up with fake scenarios of him
presenting ideas at meetings, but it gets the message across that philosophy
and politics don’t mix well.
Raphael
also doesn't want to justify society’s immoral actions and would rather say
what he really thinks even if no one agrees, which is pretty noble, but I still
don’t get why he left Utopia to just talk about it but not actually try to
affect kings or even get them interested in philosophy. Anyway, (sorry if this
is all over the place) I am looking forward to hearing more about Utopia in
Book 2!
Yes, these are dancing prisoners.
A) Thank you for that photo of dancing prisoners.
ReplyDeleteB) Sorry I'm responding so late. Although I doubt you'll actually see this but whatever!
C) My actual comment: I think the character of More is actually meant to be More. It wouldn't be that hard to change the name if he didn't want people to think he (the writer) was the character. There are a number of things about Raphael's policies that I really like the idea of. That being said I think a lot of his policies wouldn't work in reality. But that's just my opinion. I do like Raphael's preference for speaking the truth of what's on his mind (whether or not it is welcome or wanted). It might hurt but I think it's always better to say what you mean.