Monday, September 8, 2014

Beowulf; who’s your Daddy?


            As I read the epic, Beowulf, I thought deeply about the idea of family, origin, and personal identity relating to these topics.  From the start of the poem every single person mentioned is not their own being, but a son of a great father. In the back of the text one can find a layout that maps the lineage and relation between the characters; that is the definition of a tight-knit family.
            Even more catching on the idea of identity is the main reason why Beowulf traveled to Heorot in the first place.  He decided to go to settle a deal that his father, Ecgtheow, made many years ago with King Hrothgar. The gravity of these family ties of identity is especially shown on lines 371 through 389 when King Hrothgar recognizes Beowulf simply by his name, but mainly through his family and this deal.
            Further, I thought of identity as who a character’s family member is and how that affects their outcome in the epic.  For example, Beowulf is seen as a great warrior, not only by his achievements, but also his almost godly bloodline. On lines, 399- 455 (but really the whole epic) Beowulf talks about his great feats, but later he also talks about how he has the support for these killings by his elders. Is he destined to be a great?  
            In contrast, Grendel is said to have a “whole ancestry [full of] demons and ghosts” (lines1356-1357) and if that isn’t bad enough his mother is said to be a “monstrous hell-bride” on line 1259.  Compared to Beowulf, Grendel doesn’t have much going for him or his identity.  Maybe that is why he is such a Hell child: pun intended?
            Which leads me to the end of Beowulf, and the dragon.  This dragon is particularly catching to identity because he really doesn’t have one.  The dragon does not have a flawless blood line to rely on like Beowulf, but he also doesn’t have the scarlet A marking him as the descendant of Cain. So, why is he so fussy about that goblet? Only judging by outside sources, I can assume that he is like all dragons that just loves treasure.  Maybe it’s just that simple? It’s never that simple! I believe that it is the original author of Beowulf sneaky creative writing skills juxtaposing the idea of proud identity, unfortunate family ties, and not having a name tag in the world to show the downfall of each identity issue.  

4 comments:

  1. I seem to think of the curse at the end as kind of a curse for the greedy man burying the treasure. Everything comes full circle and is part if a cause and effect correlation. Everything each character does in the past renders a cost, mostly blood, and it has to be paid by someone or something. Maybe Beowulf is divine and by taking on all these fights, he is similar to Christ carrying out burdens. I'm not sure. Just a thought.
    You made a good point with the lineage and recognizing a person through his family and its accomplishments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's really interesting! I never thought of the killings as a comparison of God and Lucifer and the things each does. For example, God killing for a higher purpose whereas Grendel's mother killing in the name of a evil intent. Great food for thought.

      Delete
  2. I definitely thought of our discussion in class about our sympathy for Grendel when I read your thoughts on family reputations. As I reiterate the questions: Why does the sympathy lie on Grendel—when he was literally eating people—and not on the dragon—who was only defending what he thought was his? What makes Grendel and his mother so different?
    Throughout the poem the characters (can I call them characters) go through long, sometimes painful anecdotes of what this guy’s father did to that group of people, or what this guy did to gain honor from his people—all dedicated to the explanation of why knowing about the family’s reputation is important. Even Grendel—who has the mark of Cain—has a family history. The dragon has none whatsoever. Maybe the lack of a family history is why we don’t think the dragon deserves our sympathy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly, I feel like because the Dragon has no mother, dead father, or the sights of leaving an heir. Because of this we do not see his life or his death as something that is worth caring about in the epic. It is almost like a character needs a lineage to support their killing or their death as a sorrow.

      Delete