As I’ve
continued reading the Prologue of “The Canterbury Tales,” I’ve realized that one
of the hardest things to detect is Chaucer’s language, not in the terms of it
being written in Middle English but in regards to his opinion of certain
characters. It would be easy to say that Chaucer is sincere when talking about
each character, but that simply is not true. Last week in class we broke into
small groups and discussed whether or not we thought Chaucer liked the Squire
and the Knight. As we went around the room my group members and I became aware
that every other group had developed completely opposite opinions then we had. When
we read about the Knight we thought Chaucer was speaking rather sarcastically
and was not really a fan of the Knight but greatly respected the Squire. During
that time period, people believed that your outwardly appearance reflected who
you were as a person. This being said, we thought that although the Knight
seemed to be a kind and worthy man, his messy appearance reflected that his
life was rather unorganized and he did not take his job as seriously as he
should. Also, when talking about the Squire, we saw his curly locks and very
fashionable attire to correspond with his well-respected persona. This being
said, we thought Chaucer was a fan of the Squire. After our class discussion
last week with every group disagreeing with my group’s opinions, it is even
harder to distinguish Chaucer’s sincerity or lack there of, when speaking of
certain characters. How important is the outward appearance? Could Chaucer
perhaps be mocking the Squire’s attire rather than complementing it? With these
questions in mind, as I continue to read the book, are there any specific uses
of language or signifiers that will help me to decide one way or another
(whether Chaucer is sincere or sarcastic) or are there many possibilities for
each character in regards to Chaucer’s opinion of him or her? After reading the
prologue section about the Summoner, it is quite obvious that his appearance is
strikingly different, but is that necessarily a bad thing? Chaucer can’t help
but to dwell on his red fiery skin disease, but how important is that to the
Summoner’s identity? I suppose it is up to my interpretation to determine this,
but what if my opinion again is drastically different from those opinions of my
classmates; is there a right answer?
I think you've raised a number of really good points. With the Summoner, I definitely think his appearance has a lot to do with how terrible he is as a person. However, I think we can also look at the Squire in this way, because he seems to be doing a little too much for his appearance. Chaucer does describe his curly locks and overall nice appearance, but my group decided that it's because he spent so much time dwelling on appearance without talking about the Squire's actual deeds, it seems to indicate that the Squire is more conceited than good.
ReplyDelete