Showing posts with label Book I. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Book I. Show all posts

Monday, October 6, 2014

To Punish and Enslave

After reading Book I of Utopia, I suddenly felt the urge to go back to read Beowulf and try to understand Middle English. While the language is easier to understand, the density and seriousness that Thomas More talks in is overwhelming.  I had to stop several times to make sure my head could digest that material. Once I did, I was slightly able to comprehend what was going on between the characters.

An idea that stuck out to me was Raphael saying:

'If you allow young folk to be abominably brought up and their characters corrupted, little by little, from childhood; and if then you punish them as grownups for committing crimes to which their early training has inclined them, what else is this, I ask, but first making them thieves and then punishing them for it?’ (21)

I agree with this idea because it is hard to expect someone who has known crime or poverty their entire life, to reconsider, as they grow older. They are going to continue living the way they have because it is all they know, especially during the 1500s in Europe and elsewhere. People had little social mobility, allowing many opportunities to be out of reach. Not to mention, those who lived in poverty were concerned daily with finding food and not starving.


This doesn't mean they shouldn't be punished for their crime of thievery, but their past needs to be taken into consideration. As children, people follow the models set by their parents or guardians. If they live a life of poverty, relying on stealing and scrounging for necessities, they will most likely continue on this road. Only a select few may rise above this behavior and strive for more in life.

As a result, I think Raphael’s solution to punishing the thieves by making them repay the value of the items they stole to the victim of the crime. The thieves are not just put to death, but forced to live out their punishment and learn to abandon a life of crime. It is more just in my opinion because death is the easy way out and the criminal faces no punishment. Granted, the criminal can’t see family members or live anymore, but that’s not the point here.

I guess what I’m trying to ask is, what defines a good, justified punishment for criminals? Throughout history, there have been varieties of ways criminals have paid penance for their crimes. Arguments made concerning their effectiveness will never end.